Portfolio AnalysisLive

Two portfolios.
One map.

Put your portfolio next to another and see, technology area by technology area, who holds what.

Licensing talksFreedom to operateM&A due diligence
Request Demo See how it works
8,000 → 12comparison areas, example run
~10xless analyst time
Any timedownload your report
MapPlanAnalysisReport
What you get

One comparison. Five answers.

Both portfolios, measured against the same map.

ClassificationsZonesReportReportIllustrative

Positions on the map

See where each side sits inside every technology area. Zones mark the settled centre, the extensions around it and the frontier.

PositionsSWOTIP EdgeSTRENGTHSWEAKNESSESOPPORTUNITIESTHREATSIllustrative

SWOT and IP edge

A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats view, an IP edge summary and an executive summary. Pick your purpose first and the writing leans that way.

SWOTIP edgeExecutive summary
Area AArea BArea CArea D YouThem

Area by area numbers

How many patents each side holds, how many were filed recently, how many are still active, and which companies lead.

One shared map

Both portfolios sit on the same technology areas, grouped by what their claims say. A patent counts as yours, theirs or shared.

Off-topic Near-identical You keep

A clean set, your call

Semantyr flags patents that look off-topic or near-identical. You decide what to remove.

Built to answer Where do we overlap?Where do they lead?Where are the gaps?Who leads on each side?What is our edge?
How the analyst works with it

You stay in control at every step

Semantyr starts after your search. Bring the two patent sets you have already built.

1
PICK YOUR PURPOSELicensing talksFreedom to operateM&A due diligenceIllustrative

Pick your purpose

Licensing, freedom to operate or due diligence. The written comparison leans that way.

2
BRING TWO FILESYour portfolioDrop a fileOther portfolioDrop a fileMap columns and continueIllustrative

Bring two files

Yours and theirs, named whatever you like. Semantyr builds one shared set of technology areas.

3
CLEAN THE SETOff-topicNear-identicalKeepOff-topicKeepIllustrative

Clean the set

Review the patents flagged as off-topic or near-identical. You decide what to remove.

4
PositionsSWOTIP EdgeSTRENGTHSWEAKNESSESOPPORTUNITIESTHREATSIllustrative

Read and download

Positions, SWOT, IP edge and the executive summary, area by area.

Any timeDownload your report in one click and share it by email.
Your callYou decide which patents stay in the comparison.
One layout, every workflow

Three rails. You always know where you are.

Every Semantyr workflow works the same way. The left is what you explore. The middle is the evidence. The right is what it means.

ClassificationsZonesReport
1Technology areas
2The map
Your portfolioOther portfolioShared
3Positions, SWOT, IP edge
PositionsSWOTIP Edge
Technology areasEvery area, with how many patents each side holds.
The mapBoth portfolios on the same map, with zones marked.
Positions, SWOT, IP edgeWhere each side stands, and what to do about it.
IllustrativeIllustrative layout of the product.
Measured first, written second

The numbers are fixed before anything is written

The reasoning engine measures. The language model writes on top of what was measured. It never decides a group or a number.

Measured

By the reasoning engine. No language model.
  • How many patents each side holds in every area
  • How many were filed recently
  • How many are still active
  • Which companies lead on each side
  • Where each patent sits inside its area

Written

By the language model, from the measured groups.
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Opportunities and threats
  • The IP edge summary
  • The executive summary

The written comparison sits on top of measured groups. It is written, not calculated, and it says so.

Counting or measuring

Why the comparison is different

The usual way
The measured way
Sorting
Each side's patents counted by classification code.
Both portfolios grouped by what their claims say, on one shared map.
Reading
Totals charted. The reading is left to you.
Area by area numbers, and where each side sits inside every area.
Writing
You write the comparison yourself, after the charts.
A written comparison for your purpose, built on measured groups.
Proof

See a finished comparison

Illustrative examples of a finished comparison. Real examples are being added.

ClassificationsZonesReportReportIllustrative
PositionsSWOTIP EdgeSTRENGTHSWEAKNESSESOPPORTUNITIESTHREATSIllustrative

Questions we hear

What do I need to bring?+
Two patent files, yours and theirs. Name them whatever you like. Semantyr starts after the search, so you bring the sets you have already built with your usual tools.
Is the SWOT calculated?+
No. The groups and the numbers are measured first. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats view, and the IP edge summary, are then written by a language model from the grouped patents.
Does it work for my technology?+
Yes. Patents are grouped by what their claims say, so any technology and any filing language is treated the same way.
How is this different from counting patents by classification code?+
Counting by code tells you how many patents sit on each shelf. Semantyr groups both portfolios by claim meaning on one shared map, then shows how many patents each side holds, how recent they are and who leads, area by area.
What is it used for?+
Licensing talks, freedom to operate and M&A due diligence. Pick your purpose first and the written comparison leans that way.
Can I download my report?+
Yes, any time. Download the report in one click and share it by email.
Is my data used to train models?+
No. Customer data is never used to train any model, and workspaces are isolated from each other. Read more on the Trust & Security page.

Compare your portfolio with another

Bring two patent files. We will show you who holds what, area by area.

Request Demo
Read Trust & Security →